Hi:
Thought I'd identified this as your #38-095, but after measuring again, I'm not sure. Mounting holes are definitely 3 7/8" spacing.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Pete
Milgard casement latch

Home Owner from Scotts Valley, CA
Sep 12, 2018 1:58 pm
2 user uploaded images
7 Replies

Home Owner from Scotts Valley, CA
Sep 12, 2018 2:11 pm
Just realized the angle of the dimensions pic has distorted the dimensions. Outer edge to outer edge is 4 9/16". Radiused "recess" dimension is 4 1/4".
I think the rest is pretty clear. Thanks again!
I think the rest is pretty clear. Thanks again!

Home Owner from Scotts Valley, CA
Sep 18, 2018 11:55 am
Got your email this morning saying you're still working on this, thanks.
I'm an idiot. Mounting holes are FOUR and 7/8", not 3 7/8". Looks like the only difference between this and your #38-095 is the 1/16" difference in the mounting dimension. That would be 1/32" per hole... I'm guessing the tolerances in the window frame aren't that tight. Your thoughts?
Going to be ordering a couple of 39-253s, as well. Sorry for the incorrect info initially!
I'm an idiot. Mounting holes are FOUR and 7/8", not 3 7/8". Looks like the only difference between this and your #38-095 is the 1/16" difference in the mounting dimension. That would be 1/32" per hole... I'm guessing the tolerances in the window frame aren't that tight. Your thoughts?
Going to be ordering a couple of 39-253s, as well. Sorry for the incorrect info initially!

Home Owner from Scotts Valley, CA
Sep 18, 2018 11:59 am
Scratch that. 3 7/8" is correct. I'm old, I'm tired, and I'm working with a ruler that has 1" as the starting point.
I'm also highly embarrassed ;)
Again, let me know if the 1/16" (1/32" per hole) delta in the mounting dimension is meaningful. Thanks again.
I'm also highly embarrassed ;)
Again, let me know if the 1/16" (1/32" per hole) delta in the mounting dimension is meaningful. Thanks again.

Dave Sr. from SWISCO
Sep 19, 2018 11:06 am


Thanks for contacting us. I agree that our 38-095 is similar, but I think you may want to instead consider our 38-138 and 38-139. I personally think our 38-138 is a closer match, but the most important dimension is the projection of the fork. All the other important dimensions seem to be on point, too. See what you think.

Dave Sr. from SWISCO
Sep 19, 2018 12:58 pm


You're welcome! Thanks for your order.

Home Owner from Scotts Valley, CA
Sep 19, 2018 1:28 pm
Related Products
Related Videos